@Shark_boy_Anil as far as I know you can make an addon mod out of it yourself, all you need are the cars files. but the process to make it an addon is just a pain in the ass. therefore I am good with the replacement methode. sorry.

Okay, you want me to replace the Coil Raiden, a beautiful example of a EV from Coil (with a admittedly lacking modkit, but it forgive it for being from the Doomsday Heist), with this... oddity... that just isn't complete (there's no door handles or clear door line defining what is a car door). With aldo respect, It look like a inbred creation between a Schyster PMP 600 and a Bravado Gauntlet, while robbing the Drivetrain and Interior from a Coil Raiden (The steering wheel still bears a Coil Badge). And seeing as this DOES replace the Coil Raiden, you still have it's modkit that I'm almost certain doesn't fit this... thing... in the slightest. I have no issue with making add-on cars from replacement cars, but this just looks bad, as it is 31k polygons short of the Raiden's 78k* count, and it bears a low poly look (particularly in it's wheel arches) despite using slightly more polygons than the Voltic's 52k* count, 57k* polygons. The Voltic (which bears a much higher poly look, mind you) can be forgiven as it's a base game car from 2013 (2014 for PC's sake), but this is a 2024 replacement car that just does not look good in the slightest. And do not get me started on the fact that, lore wise, this should've been an Albany car and not... whatever the hell Amstad is.

*As measured by looking at the car's [carname]_hi.yft file in OpenIV

@MM3th0d you dont understand. this is not meant to be a gta lore car. I created this car for me, and Amstad is the brandname I would run it under in the real world. the so called missing doorlines and handles are a choice not an error. build quality not panel gabs and for the door handles look at TVR. trunk and hood lines are also not there btw. for the interior read the description. it doesnt deserve half a star.

Interesting.

@jay ricardo “I created this car for me, and Amstad is the brandname I would run it under in the real world.” I really support this point. Why shouldn't we creat new brands? Of course yes.

@ShaoyeBen Thank you, I appreciate it.

@jay ricardo It's more like you don't understand. There is a set standard for quality when it comes to GTA V cars, and I'm honestly trying to be respectful when I'm saying this, but this model is on par with cars from GTA IV, and even in that case, i'd easily say that the Schyster PMP-600 looks less... Schyster... than this. And let's be honest here: cars that aren't under the GTA manufacturers for whatever reason (real world or made by a soon-to-be-sued-by-Albany-and-Coil automotive company) is beyond stupid. Rockstar thinks so as well, if their and Take-Two Interactive's recent actions have indicated anything. And no, you stealing the Raiden's interior, not even attempting to rebrand it from the Coil Raiden with saying it's "high tech" is in no way a excuse for your poor modeling job. And you seemingly just ignored the issue of the Raiden's modkit interfering with this car in it's entirety, which it will if you have this as a replacement for the Raiden. THIS is why replacement cars are a HIGHLY ILL-ADVISED option for adding cars in 2024. Look, I'm open to someone making a Cadillac 16-esque vehicle under the Albany name, so long as it bears a modeling job that is on par to Rockstar's own cars. Sorry man, but this ain't cutting it, and you have no excuses for why it should make the cut.

@MM3th0d I don't need and excuse. the car looks and drives like I wanted it. there are always people who don't like other peoples work. Amstad is the brand I am going with and I am doing it in GTA.

your only valid point is the low poly model which is for the rage engine really good because it runs smoother with it. and it does look that good all they way to L5.

maybe you try making your own mod and you will see mastering zmodeler 3 isnt that easy.

and just because I see fits
You need to calm down
You're being too loud
And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)
You need to just stop
Like, can you just not step on my gown?
You need to calm down

@jay ricardo lol, you're a highly immature, untalented Swiftie who thinks this is good. It's not. It's pure dogshit. Absolute clownery. It's 2024, we strive for the highest quality mods, not this PS2 level shit. I fully side with @MM3th0d on this argument. At this point, this site should have strict requirements for mods to be allowed on here, be it they must be the highest quality. Also, quoting one of Swift's songs as an attack on someone, what are you, 8? Lol, you're toxic and need to grow up.

@jay ricardo Bro how did you manage to make this comment section a warzone? At this point please just make an addon 😭

@Sologamer1487 hahaha, I am the toxic one, you are kidding me. with your highest quality talk. not everyone is a pro in zmod or has the time to learn it in 2 weeks trail license.

here is another one which I see fits
And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate
Baby, I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake, shake, shake
I shake it off, I shake it off

@Shark_boy_Anil sorry still no, you can do it on your own quite quick.

@Sologamer1487 I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks that way, but PS2? That's a little harsh, even for me. Looking at 3D Universe GTAs, they are sparce on exterior model detailing, but PS2 limitations (especially for San Andreas) do call for simplifications to be made. The reason I give comparison to GTA IV and not GTA San Andreas is that it does have model fidelity that is at least on par with GTA IV (wheel arches are a big giveaway), but unfortunately has external detailing that is consistent with GTA III.

Also @jay ricardo, two week trial license? Then how in the hell did you do your initial 2018 cars, which went from January of 2018 to May of 2018? That's a period of five months, then you stopped for years to make a resurgence now while maintaining that same subpar modeling quality for anything original you done. So clearly you either gave the ZModeler people money in the past or you Yo-Ho-Ho'd it for 5 months. Your money if it's the first option, and I won't judge with the latter.

brother in allah, what the hell has bestowed upon us?

@MM3th0d true I once bought a license back then. ever used a software and then stop using it for years? you forget things. not to mention I was never good as you so politly pointed out. and before you ask. I had another 2 weeks license for the new year to make my changes.

still it doesnt deserve a half a star rating but I guess everybody can make their own choices.

I really hope you try making your own car mods someday. just so you might appreaciate the effort instead of just the final product.

have a good one.

lol wtf is this comment section?

@ShaoyeBen this thing is clearly based on a cadillac sixteen, which makes no sense if it isn't named cavalcade

Hi nice car here's the video https://youtu.be/_ipan4Pk2Hw?si=LlSj1otojcId2Y18

@Toyotacon Cavalcade is lore Escalade. You didn't even understand Cavalcade and Albany. Albany is lore Cadillac. You're really funny.

13rd